What
if Brahman, God, is not unchanging, eternal, abiding, but is evolving, just like the
universe that emanates from him. What, for
that matter, if the universe does not emanate from him at all, but exists, has
always existed, quite on its own? What
if the purpose of life is not to find God?
What if, in fact, life has no purpose?
Enter
Buddhism. Buddhism rejects such philosophical questions on the grounds they tie everyone in knots, are
crazy-makers. They are crazy-makers
because they cannot be answered with any finality. They cannot be answered empirically, in other
words, to our satisfaction. Faith is all
we have.
But the
Buddha wanted nothing to do with faith or with questions concerning the
existence and nature of Brahman, God, and the meaning, purpose of life. Set all those aside, he said. One issue alone is important, and that is
that all sentient beings suffer.
We
do not suffer constantly but we do predominately.
Some things cause us more distress than others, but, all together, they make
our lives miserable.
Chief
among the causes of suffering, the Buddha taught, was attachment. Attachment in and of itself is not bad. Rather is it what we become attached to that is the problem. What we grab onto is transient. We identify with our egoic selves, for
instance, which is ever changing.
When
we interact with other egoic selves, which are always changing as well, and with
the circumstances of our daily lives, in flux, too, we are like ships
in a stormy sea.
We become frustrated, depressed. Depression
always accompanies frustration. Even
though we profess happiness, we are sad. It is precisely this chronic sadness that the
Buddha sought to remedy.
No comments:
Post a Comment