Sunday, April 29, 2018
In a dharma talk from Dharamsala, India, on
December 19-20, 2011, the Dalai Lama talked about the nature of the
self. "Who do we mean when we say 'I?'" he
asked. For instance, the "I" we are as a baby is not the
same "I" we are as an adult.
He went on to present the well-known analogy
of a cart, pointing out that a cart is made of parts, the wheels, the box,
the pull bar, and so forth. In the same way, a person,
an "I," is made up of components. They
are called "skandhas" in Buddhism. These
are (1) the body, (2) the sense-perception, (3) the feelings, (4) the
"sankharas" (difficult to translate but meaning approximately
the instincts and the subconscious), (5) the faculty of reason.
It is the union of these "skandhas" that constitutes an
individual.
As long as the "skandhas" are held together
the individual functions as a single being, lives, and has a history, even
as each component is in perpetual flux. The body changes from day to
day only a little less conspicuously than the mental states.
At death the union dissolves, the
"skandhas" disperse, and the individual, the "I," ceases to
exist. In this way, then, the "I" is merely an appearance, and
as only an appearance it does not carry on after
death. This is the Buddhist doctrine of "anatta," no-self.
Friday, April 27, 2018
SPIRITUAL ATTRACTION
The Atman--who a person really is--is drawn
to Brahman, its source, like the needle of a compass to a magnet.
This attraction leads ultimately to the awakening of the Atman into Brahman,
called moksha or liberation in Vedanta.
The trouble comes when the compass that is the Atman becomes
covered in the dust and dirt of the thinking mind and egoic
self. Accordingly, the Atman's draw to the Brahman is lessened,
which delays its destiny.
Spiritual practice, sadhana, particularly meditation, sweeps
away the debris of the thinking mind and egoic self, making it possible
for the Atman to find and, soon enough, unite with Brahman.
In meditation the Atman is able to see that it is not
the thinking mind and egoic self that it has identified with, enabling it to
disengage from them and cast them aside.
Wednesday, April 25, 2018
THE DIFFERENCE
The
Buddhist says everything other than the Buddha’s Path to ending suffering is
irrelevant, while the Vedantist argues that everything other than union with
the Divine is irrelevant. Buddhism is
pragmatic; Vedanta is mystical.
The
Buddhist deals only with what meets the eye.
For the Vedantist, there is more than meets the eye. The Buddhist is focused on the surface of the
pond, the Vedantist on the depth of the pond.
Monday, April 23, 2018
THE ABSOLUTE
In
Vedanta, Brahman is sometimes referred to as the Absolute, or the Godhead, or
the Ground of Being.
Brahman
is conceived as either impersonal (“without qualities”), or personal (“with
qualities”), depending on the philosophical school. For example, Advaita philosophy considers
Brahman to be without form, qualities, or attributes, while Vishishtadvaita and
Dvaita philosophies understand Brahman as having infinite auspicious qualities.
Brahman
cannot be seen or heard but can be known intuitively. This is to say that it cannot be known by
empirical means, i.e. as an object of our consciousness. This is because it is our
own consciousness.
It
may be said, therefore, that moksha, liberation, does not mean knowing Brahman
intellectually. Rather it is realizing suddenly that one is and always has been
Brahman. Indeed, in Advaita’s view, a
liberated person is one who sees that Brahman is his own true self.
Generally,
Vedanta rejects the notion of an evolving Brahman since Brahman is already everything else it could be.
Saturday, April 21, 2018
NETI-NETI
In the Brhadaranyaka Upanishad, the Vedic sage
Yajnavalkya is asked by his students to describe Brahman. He states, "The Divine is not this, and
it is not that," (neti-neti).
Thus, the Divine is not real as we are real, nor
is it unreal. The Divine is not living,
in the sense that humans live, nor is it dead. The Divine is not compassionate as we use the
term, nor is it without compassion.
This is to say, we can never truly
define the Divine in words. All
we can say, in effect, is that "It isn't this, but also it isn't that
either." In the end, the student
must transcend words to understand the nature of the Divine.
Neti-neti is not unique to Vedanta. Called apophatic or negative theology, it is
also found in Greek philosophy, Islam, Buddhism, Christianity, Judaism, and
Taoism. The opposite of the apophatic
approach, called cataphatic theology, is found as well in all the philosophies
and religions of the world, including Vedanta.
Thursday, April 19, 2018
BASIC FIVE OF VEDANTA
1. Attachment: Over involvement in the outside
world, having desires for things that one does not have, and clinging to things
one has.
2. Detachment: Turning away from over involvement
in the outside world, and turning toward Brahman/God instead.
3. Karma: The principle that governs the
unfolding of events in one’s life, based on the integrity with
which one has lived his previous lives and is living his current
life.
4. Moksha, Liberation: the result of
turning away from participation in the outside world and toward Brahman/God. With
moksha comes release from the cycle of rebirths.
5. Samsara: The process of successive rebirths
until one reaches moksha.
Tuesday, April 17, 2018
CRUCIAL UNDERSTANDING
There is a
background consciousness in each of us that is aware of us and the physical
world, although it does not act in either us or the physical world. Layered over this consciousness are a
thinking mind and an egoic self which, as products of the brain, are of the physical world and do act in
it.
The
background consciousness is unchanging, permanent, and reliable while the
thinking mind and egoic self, being of the physical world, are transient, impermanent,
and unreliable.
Yet, we
identify with our thinking mind and egoic self, believing that they are who we
really are, our true selves, when, in truth, who, or rather what we really
are is the background consciousness, that which is changeless, permanent, and
abiding. Our misidentification with the thinking mind and egoic self causes us
great suffering in our lives.
The extent
to which we can separate ourselves from our thinking mind and egoic self,
called moksha, liberation in Vedanta, is the degree to which we can eliminate
our endless suffering.
But how do we separate ourselves from our thinking mind and egoic self? It is not by using them to do so. Rather, it is by realizing, by “waking up,”--it dawns on us all of a sudden--that who, what we actually are is the background consciousness, the pure consciousness that Vedanta calls Brahman.
But how do we separate ourselves from our thinking mind and egoic self? It is not by using them to do so. Rather, it is by realizing, by “waking up,”--it dawns on us all of a sudden--that who, what we actually are is the background consciousness, the pure consciousness that Vedanta calls Brahman.
Sunday, April 15, 2018
JUST BEING
We spend most of our time replaying our
past or rehearsing our future. The present, where we
actually are, where our lives are in fact taking place, we pay little
attention to. If anything, the present is an obstacle to where we
really want to be, which is in the previous moment or in the next
moment.
The present moment is a place of
waiting, waiting for the next memory or waiting for what is
going to happen next, in the future. Compounding the problem is how
fleeting the present moment, the "now," is. Where exactly
is “now?” No sooner do we believe we have it than
it drops into the past or slips into the future.
The solution is simply to stop thinking, or to think only
when we must for practical purposes. In Zen this is called no-mind, "mushin"
in Japanese, or "mind without mind.” No-mind is just
being.
All things other than humans live this way. A rock just is, a tree just is, other animals just
are. They just "be."
Friday, April 13, 2018
NO-MIND
"No-mind" in Zen is a mind not
fixed or occupied by thought or emotion and thus open to
everything. The word for this in Japanese is mushin, short
for mushin no shin, meaning mind without mind. Such a mind is likened
to a still pond which is able to reflect the moon and trees without
distortion.
Highly trained martial artists are said to enter
into this state during combat. They rely, in this way, not on
what they "think" should be their next move, but
on what their trained natural reaction is, or
on what they feel intuitively is the next
move. No-mind is not, however, a state of relaxation. Rather, the mind is working at a high
rate of speed, only with no intentions, plans or direction.
A demonstration of mushin that is well known
among martial artists is when a master stands on one side of a stage and a
student of his on the other. The
student shoots an arrow at the master's chest and the master catches the
speeding arrow in one hand inches from the arrow's destination. The
master does not think about when he should reach for the arrow. He
just reaches.
Wednesday, April 11, 2018
WHY “NOW”?
We emphasize living in the present moment rather than, as we
are prone to do, in the past or in the future. But why is this so
important? When our attention is focused on the present moment,
on "now," it is not all out and around but inward, and inward is
the gateway to God, or to what Eckhart Tolle calls
Presence.
It could just as well be called Buddha-Nature, that
is, "the uncreated and indestructible essence, svabhava, or
'true Self' of all beings." In Vedanta it
is Atman/Brahman. Christians refer to it as the kingdom of God,
"The kingdom of God is within you," Luke 17:21. It is
living where life
actually is and what life actually
is.
Sunday, April 8, 2018
BUDDHA-NATURE
When the Buddha became enlightened he realized
that all beings without exception have the same nature and potential for
enlightenment, and this is known as buddha-nature. This is to
say, all beings have buddha-nature because all beings have within them
what is called the essence of the Buddha, this seed, which can
blossom into a buddha and which constitutes one's potential for
enlightenment.
Buddha-nature, also called Buddha-dhatu or Buddha
Principle, (Tathagatagarbha in Sanskrit; Bussho in Japanese) is
taught differently in the various Buddhist traditions. In
Chinese Ch’an Buddhism, for example, buddha-nature is seen as the
essential nature of all beings. Here, enlightenment is a process of
uncovering this inherent nature. Buddha
nature is considered to be identical with transcendental
reality. It is the unity of the Buddha with everything that exists.
Tibetan Buddhism speaks of buddha-nature in terms
of the true nature of mind. The true nature of mind, they
say, is beyond conception, yet it is present in every object. The true nature is always here, but due to our
temporary obscurations, i.e. our activities in the world,
our egoic perceptions, etc., we do not recognize
it. Buddha-nature is beyond conception; it cannot be
explained, cannot be encompassed by words. Although we can say
it is, for instance, clarity and vastness, we cannot see it or touch
it; it is beyond expression.
The doctrine of buddha-nature is
often associated with the Lotus Sutra and its influence on later sutras. One of the unique themes in the Lotus Sutra, particularly in the tenth
chapter titled "Teachers of the Dharma," is the assertion, again,
that everyone has the ability to become a buddha, that this ability is not
limited to monks, nuns, laypeople, or bodhisattvas,
but is present in other beings even in non-human
creatures. All living beings not only have the ability to become a
buddha, but indeed can be a "teacher of the Dharma" here and now.
Friday, April 6, 2018
LOTUS SUTRA
Three principal themes dominate the Lotus Sutra:
First, all vehicles are one
vehicle. Here, the doctrine of triyana, or "three
vehicles" to nirvana is discussed. The triyana describes people
who realize enlightenment by hearing the Buddha's sermons; people who realize
enlightenment for themselves through their own effort; and, lastly, people
who have chosen the way of the bodhisattva, a bodhisattva being one who has
postponed buddhahood in order to help others gain enlightenment. But the Lotus Sutra says that the three
vehicles are one vehicle, the buddha vehicle.
The second theme is that all beings may attain buddhahood and
attain nirvana. One point of significance here is the Buddha's
promise to several women that they will attain buddhahood without having
to be reborn as men. Meantime, the Buddha is presented in the Lotus
Sutra as dharmakaya--the unity of all things and beings, unmanifested, beyond existence
or nonexistence, unbound by time and space. Because the dharmakaya is all beings, all
beings have the potential to awaken to their true nature and attain buddhahood.
The final theme is the importance of
faith and devotion. This is to say that buddhahood may not be attained
through intellect alone. Indeed, the
Mahayana view is that the absolute teaching cannot be expressed in words or
understood by ordinary cognition. This is why the Lotus Sutra emphasizes
the significance of faith and devotion because it makes buddhahood more
accessible to laypeople, who do not spend their lives in ascetic monastic
practice.
In 6th century China, the Lotus Sutra was promoted as
the supreme sutra by the monk Chih-i, founder of the Tiantai school of Mahayana
Buddhism, called Tendai in Japan. In
part through Tendai influence, the Lotus became the most revered sutra in
Japan. It deeply influenced Japanese Zen
and also is an object of devotion of the Nichiren school.
Wednesday, April 4, 2018
KRIPA
Kripa in Vedanta is the concept of divine
grace. It is the central tenet of Bhakti, devotional Yoga and is akin to
similar beliefs found in the mysticism of all traditions.
In Vedanta, divine grace can catapult a
devotee into a period of intense personal transformation which in
turn can lead to his moksha, liberation.
Bhakti literature is replete with references
to kripa, seeing it as the ultimate key to self-realization. In
fact, some, like the ancient sage Vasistha, in his classical work Yoga Vasistha,
considered it the only way to transcend the bondage of lifetimes of karma.
Vasistha states that divine grace is
the sole way of moving beyond the effects of prarabdha karma, past
karmas, that are carried by each person and which are ready
to be experienced through the present body.
The Vedanta philosopher Madhvacharya believed that
grace was not a gift from God but something that must be earned.
The Buddha, by contrast, did not speak of divine
grace, but then neither did he speak of God. What he taught, however, is
not considered incompatible with the idea of divine grace.
Monday, April 2, 2018
WHERE IS GOD?
Vedanta teaches that God is not "out there" somewhere,
but rather, as Jesus said, "The Kingdom of God is
within." In the words of Swami Prabhavananda, "Never for one
moment are we separated from God. God is within us always."
The task of the spiritual aspirant is to awaken to God. By
way of spiritual practice (sadhana), to include meditation and devotion, an
atmosphere is created whereby, as it is described, the Atman can awaken to
Brahman. What makes it a profound experience is that the Atman
IS Brahman, or as Jesus said, "I and my Father are one."