Wednesday, March 30, 2016
Individual consciousness
comes to see, over time, that it is a broader consciousness, not that it is a
part of a broader consciousness, but that it is entirely a broader
consciousness.
DISTRACTIONS
Distractions, such as sights, sounds, people, and ideas, are like waves
on the surface of a pond. They deny us a
clear view of what is deep within, God.
Commentators on the yoga philosophy of Patanjali use a similar analogy. They say that if the surface of a lake is covered with ripples, or its water is muddy, the bottom cannot be seen. The lake is the chitta, the perceiving/thinking mind, while the bottom of the lake is the Atman.
Whenever the ripples of the lake are made tranquil, knowledge of the Atman is revealed. Christ spoke of this in his beatitude: “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.”
No one can avoid distractions altogether, but Vedanta, in its doctrine of non-attachment, teaches that they can be managed. The old saying “in one ear and out the other” is the idea. It is, generally speaking, to disregard, to give no real importance to, sights, sounds, persons, and ideas.
There is always the risk, however, of a distraction that utterly captures us, something that, for whatever reason, we are particularly vulnerable to, something that we are powerless to dismiss.
The solution, in such an instance, is to acknowledge to ourselves our susceptibility, and to understand that it is a state of mind only, and that we are not our mind. We are not the chitta.
Commentators on the yoga philosophy of Patanjali use a similar analogy. They say that if the surface of a lake is covered with ripples, or its water is muddy, the bottom cannot be seen. The lake is the chitta, the perceiving/thinking mind, while the bottom of the lake is the Atman.
Whenever the ripples of the lake are made tranquil, knowledge of the Atman is revealed. Christ spoke of this in his beatitude: “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.”
No one can avoid distractions altogether, but Vedanta, in its doctrine of non-attachment, teaches that they can be managed. The old saying “in one ear and out the other” is the idea. It is, generally speaking, to disregard, to give no real importance to, sights, sounds, persons, and ideas.
There is always the risk, however, of a distraction that utterly captures us, something that, for whatever reason, we are particularly vulnerable to, something that we are powerless to dismiss.
The solution, in such an instance, is to acknowledge to ourselves our susceptibility, and to understand that it is a state of mind only, and that we are not our mind. We are not the chitta.
Monday, March 28, 2016
BUDDHIST VIEW OF KARMA
Buddhists and Vedantists agree that a person reaps what he sows,
as set forth in the Law of Karma. This
is to say, a person of good character when life ends is reborn of good
character, and a person of evil character at the moment of death is reborn of evil
character.
The Law of Karma operates like a law of nature in that it is impersonal, predictable.
Gradually, however, the law took on a more terrible interpretation. The implication now was that every individual act that a person did throughout his life had karmic consequences, as opposed to the cumulative effect of the acts by the end of a person’s life.
The Buddha gave the law more flexibility, however. In his view, a person could experience so complete a change of heart or disposition (by following Buddhist teachings presumably) as to escape any negative karmic consequences from his current and previous life.
Those who underwent so profound a change, who were no longer burdened by “the will-to-live-and-have,” by the longing for life, could be assured, the Buddha said, that their old karma was now exhausted and that no new karma was being produced, and that they, at death, would be extinguished like a lamp, never again to be reborn in this world of woe.
The Law of Karma operates like a law of nature in that it is impersonal, predictable.
Gradually, however, the law took on a more terrible interpretation. The implication now was that every individual act that a person did throughout his life had karmic consequences, as opposed to the cumulative effect of the acts by the end of a person’s life.
The Buddha gave the law more flexibility, however. In his view, a person could experience so complete a change of heart or disposition (by following Buddhist teachings presumably) as to escape any negative karmic consequences from his current and previous life.
Those who underwent so profound a change, who were no longer burdened by “the will-to-live-and-have,” by the longing for life, could be assured, the Buddha said, that their old karma was now exhausted and that no new karma was being produced, and that they, at death, would be extinguished like a lamp, never again to be reborn in this world of woe.
Friday, March 25, 2016
REINCARNATION IN BUDDHISM
There is no permanent self that reincarnates from one life to the
next, Buddhism teaches, as compared to Vedanta where there is such a self, the
Atman.
Buddhism acknowledges, however, that something must reincarnate, in light of the Law of Karma. That something is, in fact, karma.
Only karma passes from one life to another, since a person is merely the five skandhas comprising him, body, consciousness, sensations, cognition, and mental constructions that initiate actions, which disperse when the person dies.
Reincarnation where there is no transfer of a self was likened by the Buddha to the flame of a candle passed from another candle. It is the same flame but different candles.
There is, however, no psycho-mental element transmitted between lives, the reborn person having no memory of his previous life, or of any of his past lives.
Buddhism underscores, meanwhile, the extreme rarity of human birth, a slim coincidence, indeed, when it happens, and an even slimmer coincidence should it be a Tathagata, a Buddha.
A person ceases to be reincarnated when all his karma has been worked through, and he experiences Nirvana.
Buddhism acknowledges, however, that something must reincarnate, in light of the Law of Karma. That something is, in fact, karma.
Only karma passes from one life to another, since a person is merely the five skandhas comprising him, body, consciousness, sensations, cognition, and mental constructions that initiate actions, which disperse when the person dies.
Reincarnation where there is no transfer of a self was likened by the Buddha to the flame of a candle passed from another candle. It is the same flame but different candles.
There is, however, no psycho-mental element transmitted between lives, the reborn person having no memory of his previous life, or of any of his past lives.
Buddhism underscores, meanwhile, the extreme rarity of human birth, a slim coincidence, indeed, when it happens, and an even slimmer coincidence should it be a Tathagata, a Buddha.
A person ceases to be reincarnated when all his karma has been worked through, and he experiences Nirvana.
Thursday, March 24, 2016
OBJECTS
Buddhists conceive an
object, a rock for instance, as an event and not as a thing or substance.
AS IT IS
Buddhists accept the
world as they find it, as it is. They
call this suchness, thusness, or tathata, the world without ideas superimposed
upon it.
Above all, they do not
place blame. They believe that the
individual determines what happens to him, not something “out there.” The external world only reacts to what the
individual does.
NO REHEARSAL, NO REPLAY
Our minds rehearse
constantly what we will say to someone in the future, and replay constantly
what we have already said to them in the past.
But there is no future,
and there is no past. Bring out the future and show it to me, the Buddha said.
Bring out the past and show it to me, he likewise said.
Living in the present
is the correct approach, treating each heartbeat, each breath, each meal, each laugh, as if
it was our last, because one day it will be.
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
AHIMSA
Ahimsa is the principle of non-injury. “All
things breathing, all things existing, all things living, all beings whatsoever
should not be slain or treated with violence, or insulted or tortured or driven
away,” states the Acaranga Sutra of Jainism, the view of Buddhism and Vedanta
as well.
While walking in the
forest, for instance, Jain monks carry long staffs which they tap on the ground
in front of them to drive off small animals and insects so they do not
accidentally get trampled.
Ahimsa, in addition to
physical non-injury, includes mental non-injury, as in the case of what
Buddhism calls the destructive emotions, the mental afflictions. Anger, ill will, hatred, jealousy, resentment are among these.
FORGIVENESS
Forgiving someone of something is the greatest gift a person can give
another, as well as give himself. Forgiveness includes not trying to change
someone who does not want to change or who cannot change.
Monday, March 21, 2016
LAW OF CAUSE AND EFFECT
In Buddhism this is
called dependent origination, meaning that what is, is dependent upon something
else. If this is, that comes to be; from
the arising of this, that arises; if this is not, that does not come to be;
from the stopping of this, that stops, the Majjhima-Nikaya II.32 puts it.
A skillful man asks,
for example, “What are the consequences of my actions? Will it lead to hurt of self, of others, or of
both? What will happen if I stop, or do
nothing?” Dependent origination is like
a clock where if one wheel turns, all the wheels turn. Everything changes with one change, or not.
Interdependence, called ji-ji muge
in Buddhism, is a related principle. This
is the mutual interpenetration of all things and events, likened to a spider’s web where every dew drop on the web reflects
every other dew drop on it. Existence is
all one thing, and reacts as one thing.
To be aware of dependent
origination and Ji-ji muge is called mindfulness. Persons not aware of these principles are
either ignorant, termed avidya, or they are ignore-ant; they ignore the principles. In either case, the result is suffering.
In the words of the
author John B. Noss, “The cause of human misery and evil is ignorance. Man in general is so darkly ignorant about his
own nature that all of his actions have the wrong orientation. Not moral transgression then, but mental error
is the root of human misery and evil.”
The author Edward Rice adds, “The result of ignorance is an endless chain of false illusions in which each succeeding illusion is due to its preceding illusion.”
The author Edward Rice adds, “The result of ignorance is an endless chain of false illusions in which each succeeding illusion is due to its preceding illusion.”
Saturday, March 19, 2016
TRUTH OF IT
The truth is that we
are on a rock hurtling blindly through space, a rock containing, by a fluke,
life forms. The biggest fluke is that
one of these life forms is aware of itself, we humans.
We are aware, for example, that we will die one day, which other life forms do not know about themselves.
We are aware, for example, that we will die one day, which other life forms do not know about themselves.
Life on this rock has
no purpose beyond perpetuating itself. We
are in denial about our life on this rock.
We understand it intellectually, but cannot grasp the reality of it,
entirely.
When we look at the
stars at night we do not know what truly it is we are looking at, otherwise we
would be screaming in terror in the streets.
We have, at the same
time, a false sense of security about it, much as we have when we climb into a
jet plane, believing that we are as safe in it as we are walking around outside
it.
The same with driving a plastic box, that we call a car, at 70 miles an hour. It is insane.
The same with driving a plastic box, that we call a car, at 70 miles an hour. It is insane.
Buddhists see through
the illusion, see past the smoke and mirrors.
They have awakened from the trance we are in, into reality.
Thursday, March 17, 2016
PHANTOM SELF
It was Krishnamurti
who said, “Could it be that you identify yourself with a merely abstract ego,
based on nothing but memories?” There is
this physical body, this happening, sure enough, Alan Watts said, but that is
all there is. Moreover, there is no self
separate from the rest of existence as our minds would have us believe.
Hormones contribute to
the illusion of the self, the lie of hormones. For example, it is not until testosterone
begins to recede in aging men that they see the extent to which they have
been viewing the world through a veil. Fluctuating hormones in women have the same effect.
There is the lie of
symbolic thinking, thinking about thinking and the problems that thinking
creates, plus the lie of language, words about words and problems that words
create. We do not know what we are
looking at half the time and then go on to talk and write about it using
symbols that are only approximations of what we mean.
The semantics scholar Alfred
Korzybski noted, “Whatever you say something is, it isn’t,” with Alan Watts
adding, “nothing is really describable.” Yet, we identify ourselves with our thoughts. We think we are our thoughts.
There is the lie of
feeling states. When we are lonely we
miss our family, friends, and God. Loneliness, though, like all other feeling
states, comes from thoughts, Krishnamurti explained, and thoughts are impermanent,
transient, and unreliable. Feelings,
likewise then, are impermanent, transient, and unreliable.
Still, we identify
ourselves with our feelings. We feel we
are our feelings. We feel we are our
moods. Our lives are just these smoke
and mirrors, called maya in Buddhism and Vedanta, meaning to be enchanted,
spellbound. What we actually are is just
consciousness. We are a conscious body.
All the individual is,
Buddhism teaches, "is a temporary collection of momentary events that are
constantly in flux in their causal relationship to each other, with a
consciousness that expires when the individual expires."
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
KILLING TIME
There is the art of
properly killing time. It is killing
time before it kills us. When the Dalai
Lama is not teaching, he repairs clocks, a reminder to him that we are all “on
the clock,” memento mori, remember death.
Repairing clocks, or whatever we choose, is diversion, which keeps the mind from itself.
LIBERATION
“Survival is not the
issue, because you are not going to survive,” Alan Watts said. Liberation is it. Everything other than liberation is
irrelevant.
There is but one thing. Our day must be for this one thing only. We must make liberation our occupation.
All anyone wants is to
feel happy. We are naturally happy. The reason we are not is because we are bound
up with the irrelevant.
WHY ARE WE UNHAPPY?
We are unhappy,
Buddhism holds, because we are filled with wanting, with desire, to the point
that eventually the desire becomes a thirst that cannot be satisfied, even when
we achieve what we desire.
How, then, can we be
happy? By ceasing to desire. Just as a fire dies down when no fuel is added,
so our unhappiness will end when the fuel of desire is removed.
We must stop obsessively striving, grasping, clinging, clutching, wanting to do this or to be that, for even when we attain what we want, it is not enough. The more we have the more we want.
We must stop obsessively striving, grasping, clinging, clutching, wanting to do this or to be that, for even when we attain what we want, it is not enough. The more we have the more we want.
Attaining what we want
is suffering just as much as not attaining it is, with suffering defined as
chronic frustration. What is gained by
striving but wealth, power, and prestige, what society has taught us are the
desirable things.
But Krishnamurti said,
“Think it through. Do you really want
what you think you want?” Beware of what
you want, you might get it, the old saying goes; hell is getting what you want.
The reality of wealth,
power, and prestige is that they are transient and therefore will end soon
enough in suffering. The aim of Buddhism is to eliminate suffering. The view that less is more, is the correct one.
By not having a lot
and not wanting a lot we take the greatest pleasure in the smallest things and are
happy. He who knows he has enough is
rich, Lao Tzu said.
Monday, March 14, 2016
DIRECT EXPERIENCE VS. SECONDARY EXPERIENCE
As it does not cause
suffering, direct experience is superior to secondary experience.
Direct experience is,
for instance, classical music, which is abstract sound without literal meaning; physical
labor, such as shoveling gravel, is the movement of muscles requiring minimal thinking;
and color, as in a painting by Jackson Pollock, is a spectrum of light with no
meaning in itself. Direct experience is
that of the five senses, in other words.
Secondary experience
is the symbolic world, thinking and language, life once removed. While secondary experience is useful in ways,
it generates a world unto itself and, ultimately, is false, or, more often than not, is only
partly true.
OPPOSITES
Opposites only appear to be opposites. In point of fact, they are
one, called, in Buddhism, the unity of opposites. Everything is the same energy. Opposites are two sides of the same coin. You cannot have light without dark, substance
without space, life without death, self without other. They go together. They arise mutually, called the coincidence of
opposites, and continually create each other.
NONATTACHMENT
Buddhism, as well as
Vedanta, teaches the principle of nonattachment. We are to avoid all attachments, all fetters,
all chains that bind. This includes
attachment to personal possessions, location, money, other people, and most of
all ourselves.
Attaching ourselves to
things is folly because soon enough we are bored with them, wish we never had
them, yet cannot get rid of them. We
become attached to people but because we do not like most of them all that
much, it jeopardizes our happiness in the end. Have feelings for people, the Buddha said, but
do not make them responsible for your happiness.
And why should we
attach ourselves to ourselves, to our physical selves especially, for our
physical selves are dying, have been dying from the day we were born? Why should we attach ourselves to our
psychological selves when our psychological selves are an illusion?
Friday, March 11, 2016
EXISTENCE IS IMPERMANENT
When a prince asked
his jeweler to make him something that would carry him through times of triumph
as well as times of defeat, the jeweler made him a ring inscribed with the
words, “It will pass.” The Buddhist term
for impermanence is annica
Existence is in a
state of flux. Every day is
different. Every moment is different. All is transient, hence unreliable, hence the
cause of all suffering.
We seek fulfillment in
life but we never really feel fulfilled because what we seek fulfillment in, is
time bound, transient. When we try to
grasp it, it just runs through our hands.
We are not happy with
what we achieve, own, and know because too quickly we are tired of it, are
bored with it. Time kills it. We then go on to achieve, own, and know more,
which again because of time is satisfying only briefly.
SUFFERING
The
issue of suffering is found in Vedanta and Buddhism alike. The term for it in Buddhism is dukkha.
According to Buddhist
psychology, life is not all suffering, but largely it is. Every moment of life when happiness and inner
peace are absent is a moment of suffering.
When we are rushing,
impatient, irritated, frustrated, anxious, angry, fearful, bored, sad, or
jealous, when we are filled with desire for something we want that we do not
have, or feel aversion for something we do have but that we do not want, we are
suffering.
When we are reliving a
painful experience from our past or imagining a future one, we are suffering. Nothing on this planet is free of it. Even long-time Buddhists who endeavor to not
suffer still do so, because no one can eliminate all of his sources of
suffering.
BUDDHIST BEGINNINGS
I wrote only about
Buddhism at first, starting with a personal confession:
I felt from an early
age that I was being lied to, was being betrayed. But by whom? By what? At the same time, I felt myself a lie. When I opened my mouth I did not know who it
was that was speaking. I spent years in the academy
which I argued to myself was worth the effort. It was stimulating intellectually, and
entertaining even, but of what use was it in the end? What I really wanted was salvation.
Seek out your own
salvation with diligence, Buddhism teaches. Try it, see for yourself.
You can search
throughout the entire universe for someone who is more deserving of salvation
than you are yourself, and that person is not to be found anywhere, the Buddha said. When we are suffering we are as much in need
of our compassion as is any other being, and we are equally deserving of it.
Wednesday, March 9, 2016
VEDANTA AND THE BEATITUDES
Swami Prabhavananda
regarded Christ with the same reverence as India’s greatest teachers, and in
his lectures he often used Christ’s teachings to illustrate spiritual
truths.
In his book The Sermon on the Mount According to Vedanta, Prabhvananda discussed The Beatitudes, beginning with blessed are the poor in spirit for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
What exactly does “poor in spirit” mean? In Vedanta, it means transcending pride. It means being humble, which is to say, a person must not be so distracted by himself as to be unreceptive to higher teachings.
Blessed are they that mourn for they shall be comforted, concerns spiritual loss, spiritual loneliness. It is crying for God, spiritual longing. It is when we are haunted by loneliness for God. Shedding even one tear for him invites God into our lives.
Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth. What is meekness? Prabhavananda says that it is to live in self-surrender to God, free from the sense of “me” and “mine.”
Blessed are they who hunger and thirst after righteousness for they shall be filled. What is the righteousness for which Christ wants us to hunger and thirst? It is the righteousness of God himself.
Blessed are the merciful for they shall obtain mercy, means that we should forgive those who wrong us. In the words of Patanjali, “Undisturbed calmness of the mind is attained by cultivating friendliness toward the happy, mercy and compassion for the unhappy, delight in the virtuous, and indifference towards the wicked.”
Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God. What is this purity that we must have before God reveals himself to us? Our habit is thinking of everything other than God, so purity is ridding ourselves of this habit.
Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God. Vedanta teaches that when our hearts are uplifted by God’s presence, we no longer have any desire to quarrel.
And lastly, blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. There are those in the world who will mock us, revile us even, and try to do us harm. But we, the religious, must not react to this, keeping our minds solely on God.
In his book The Sermon on the Mount According to Vedanta, Prabhvananda discussed The Beatitudes, beginning with blessed are the poor in spirit for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
What exactly does “poor in spirit” mean? In Vedanta, it means transcending pride. It means being humble, which is to say, a person must not be so distracted by himself as to be unreceptive to higher teachings.
Blessed are they that mourn for they shall be comforted, concerns spiritual loss, spiritual loneliness. It is crying for God, spiritual longing. It is when we are haunted by loneliness for God. Shedding even one tear for him invites God into our lives.
Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth. What is meekness? Prabhavananda says that it is to live in self-surrender to God, free from the sense of “me” and “mine.”
Blessed are they who hunger and thirst after righteousness for they shall be filled. What is the righteousness for which Christ wants us to hunger and thirst? It is the righteousness of God himself.
Blessed are the merciful for they shall obtain mercy, means that we should forgive those who wrong us. In the words of Patanjali, “Undisturbed calmness of the mind is attained by cultivating friendliness toward the happy, mercy and compassion for the unhappy, delight in the virtuous, and indifference towards the wicked.”
Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God. What is this purity that we must have before God reveals himself to us? Our habit is thinking of everything other than God, so purity is ridding ourselves of this habit.
Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God. Vedanta teaches that when our hearts are uplifted by God’s presence, we no longer have any desire to quarrel.
And lastly, blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. There are those in the world who will mock us, revile us even, and try to do us harm. But we, the religious, must not react to this, keeping our minds solely on God.
Sunday, March 6, 2016
Saturday, March 5, 2016
WHERE DOES IT COME FROM?
When
a student asked him what she should do with her life, Joseph Campbell, the
mythologist, writer and lecturer, told her “follow your bliss.”
He borrowed the expression, he said, from Vedanta’s sat-chit-ananda, where sat is full being, chit is full consciousness, and ananda is full bliss, rapture.
Campbell confessed that he did not know what full being and full consciousness were exactly, but he definitely knew what full bliss was. So by “follow your bliss” Campbell meant follow your passion, follow what inspires you the most.
But now where does this passion come from?
Campbell said simply that it is with you, like tracks guiding you. Bill Moyers, in one of his interviews with Campbell for The Power of Myth television series used the expression “invisible hands.”
Did Campbell feel such unseen guidance? Yes, indeed, Campbell replied, he felt it his entire life. This was the bliss he followed.
He borrowed the expression, he said, from Vedanta’s sat-chit-ananda, where sat is full being, chit is full consciousness, and ananda is full bliss, rapture.
Campbell confessed that he did not know what full being and full consciousness were exactly, but he definitely knew what full bliss was. So by “follow your bliss” Campbell meant follow your passion, follow what inspires you the most.
But now where does this passion come from?
Campbell said simply that it is with you, like tracks guiding you. Bill Moyers, in one of his interviews with Campbell for The Power of Myth television series used the expression “invisible hands.”
Did Campbell feel such unseen guidance? Yes, indeed, Campbell replied, he felt it his entire life. This was the bliss he followed.
Wednesday, March 2, 2016
MIND AND ATMAN
We
have a mind but are not the mind. The
mind is like our onboard computer. Philosopher
Alan Watts said that the mind is a useful tool but did not say that it was who
he was.
The mind creates the illusion of self, the person, the ego, the “I,” which operates in maya, the illusion of the world of form.
A person’s true self, the Atman, is covered by five kosha, or sheaths, which include the mind and intellect. But the Atman is separate from these sheaths and is unaffected by them. The Atman experiences them, witnesses them, but that is all.
The mind is not the Atman or any conception it has of the Atman.
The Atman, like its source Brahman, is absolute consciousness, which remains constant throughout a person’s life, and throughout all of the lives that it occupies for as many years, centuries, millennia that it takes for it to become liberated.
The mind does not liberate the Atman. The liberation of the Atman is likened to a bubble of air drifting up from the bottom of a pond. When the bubble, Atman, reaches the surface, Brahman, it merges with it and is liberated.
The mind creates the illusion of self, the person, the ego, the “I,” which operates in maya, the illusion of the world of form.
A person’s true self, the Atman, is covered by five kosha, or sheaths, which include the mind and intellect. But the Atman is separate from these sheaths and is unaffected by them. The Atman experiences them, witnesses them, but that is all.
The mind is not the Atman or any conception it has of the Atman.
The Atman, like its source Brahman, is absolute consciousness, which remains constant throughout a person’s life, and throughout all of the lives that it occupies for as many years, centuries, millennia that it takes for it to become liberated.
The mind does not liberate the Atman. The liberation of the Atman is likened to a bubble of air drifting up from the bottom of a pond. When the bubble, Atman, reaches the surface, Brahman, it merges with it and is liberated.